ATI etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
ATI etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

14 Aralık 2010 Salı

AMD Radeon Video Card Drivers 10.12/ AMD Catalyst Software Suite


ATI CatalystAMD’s award-winning ATI Catalyst graphics and HD video configuration software delivers unprecedented control of performance and visual quality with ATI Radeon™ graphics processors. Certified by Microsoft® Windows® Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL), ATI Catalyst drivers for Windows 7®, Vista® and Windows® XP operating systems deliver stable performance and push the limits of innovation with advanced user-oriented features.

This is the latest AMD’s industry leading software suite, Catalyst™. This particular software suite updates both the AMD Display Driver, and the Catalyst™ Control Center. This unified Driver has been further enhanced to provide the highest level of power, performance, and reliability. The AMD Catalyst™ software suite is the ultimate in performance and stability.
Precision controls for power users. Tweaks for gamers and video enthusiasts. Simple wizard-assisted setup, easy multi-monitor configuration, and ultra reliable operation for working professionals. New user or seasoned expert, AMD Catalyst puts you in charge of The Ultimate Visual Experience™.

• Industry-leading performance. ATI Catalyst boosts graphics performance with every new monthly release, including enhancements for popular Direct3D and OpenGL game titles.
• Innovative and exciting features. ATI Catalyst includes the ATI Catalyst Control Center™, delivering innovative features and unprecedented control of performance and visual quality with ATI Radeon graphics.
• Robust stability. ATI Catalyst drivers for Windows Vista and Windows XP are Microsoft WHQL-certified, and include rigorously tested Linux drivers to deliver the industry’s most stable and reliable graphics performance.
The AMD Catalyst™ software suite 10.11 contains the following:  
• AMD display driver version 8.791
• HydraVision™ for Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7
• Southbridge/IXP Driver
• AMD Catalyst™ Control Center version 8.79
Caution: The Catalyst™ software driver and the Catalyst™ Control Center can be downloaded independently of each other. However, for maximum stability and performance AMD recommends that both components be updated from the same Catalyst™ release
Caution: The Catalyst™ Control Center requires that the Microsoft .NET Framework version 2.0 be installed. Without .NET version 2.0 installed, the Catalyst™ Control Center will not launch properly and the user will see an error message.
The latest version of the Catalyst™ software suite is designed to support the following Microsoft Windows platforms:
• Windows 7 32-bit version
• Windows 7 64-bit version
• Windows Vista 32-bit version
• Windows Vista 64-bit version
• Windows XP Professional
• Windows XP Home Edition
• Windows XP Media Center Edition
• Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
Release Notes
Download your selected driver from AMD website
Download Selected AMD Graphics Drivers & Software

13 Aralık 2010 Pazartesi

AMD Radeon HD 6970 Benchmarking Results Leaked

AMD's Radeon HD 6900 series is set to go public at some point in the near future, and for this reason, it should come as no surprise that we're starting to see all sorts of interesting leaks available online, starting from photos of the various implementations of the reference design and going as far as full-fledged benchmarks.

In fact, benchmarking is exactly the topic we'll tackle as follows, since it seems that the first (unofficial) test results of the Radeon HD 6970 graphics card have alredy made their way online, courtesy of ChipHell, painting a fairly interesting picture of what we should expect from AMD's soon-to-be-released GPU.

So, apparently, when running the 3DMark 2011 Performance test, the Radeon HD 6970 managed to get 4939 points (1776 points in Extreme mode), while the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark provided a score of 20346 points, the High mode test leading to 15386 points.

In the Unigine Heaven Benchmark, on the other hand, the Radeon card got 639 points, maximum FPS being rated at 61.8, minimum at 3.8 and average at 25.4.

The same source mentioned above provides some interesting tech details regarding the next-gen Radeon card obtained with the help of the GPUz application, which seem to point out the fact that the Radeon HD 6970 will come equipped with 1600 Unified Shaders, 2GB of GDDR5 memory, 256-bit bus width and 176 GB/s bandwidth, as well as a GPU clock of 880 Mhz and a memory clock rated at 1375 Mhz.

The conclusion of these leaked benchmarks seem to be that, while the HD 6970 is certainly a powerful graphics board, it's not exactly a competitor for the GTX 580 from NVIDIA, but rather for the GTX 570/480.

Of course, since we're talking about leaked materials for the time being, we prefer to wait until the card is officially outed and more official results are in before deciding what exact market segment the Radeon HD 6970 targets and what NVIDIA GPU it takes on

10 Aralık 2010 Cuma

AMD Display Driver - Catalyst 10.12 Better than Catalyst 10.11

A week past, according to the regularity of AMD Catalyst display driver, this is December, so the latest AMD Catalyst 10.12 would be upcoming soon - which is also expected by almost AMD fans. In fact, many end-users are waiting for the new AMD Catalyst 10.12 because that the last AMD Catalyst 10.11 was so disappointed.
AMD Catalyst 10.11 Issues Firstly, the Catalyst 10.11 did not support the latest AMD Radeon HD 6000 series graphics cards. Therefore, many people chose to use the AMD Catalyst 10.10 or AMD Catalyst 10.10e Hotfix.
AMD Catalyst 10.12 Better than Catalyst 10.11 Then, as the Catalyst 10.11 is announced to support the Radeon HD 2000, HD 3000, HD 4000, and HD 5000 series graphics cards, however, when end-users installed this driver, especially for Radeon HD 5770 starting Windows after 5 seconds the screen changed to black and stopped working so that they had to go to safe mode and restore old drivers Catalyst 10.10.
In addition, some end-users also mentioned when they updated the Catalyst 10.11, there were some problems with their HDTV, based Radeon HD 5850 or Radeon HD 5870.
Therefore, end-users expect a Catalyst 10.11 hotfix or the upcoming AMD Catalyst 10.12 can be better than version 10.11 and fix these mentioned issues.

Confusion Abounds over new AMD Radeon HD 6500M Mobility Graphics

AMD's has published details of their new mobility 6000 series part, the HD 6500M. The part is available in shipping products today... except we're not sure what it is. The specifications read like the Redwood based Mobility HD5650, apart from some key differentiators.
  • TeraScale 2 Unified Processing Architecture
    • 400 Stream Processing Units
    • 20 Texture Units
    • 32 Z/Stencil ROP Units
    • 8 Color ROP Units
  • Engine clock speed: 500-650 MHz
  • GDDR5/DDR3 memory interface
  • Memory clock speed: 900 MHz GDDR5 or DDR3
  • Memory data rate: 3.6 Gbps (GDDR5) or 1.8 Gbps (DDR3)
  • Memory bandwidth: 57.6 GB/sec (GDDR5) or 28.8 GB/sec (DDR3)

Here's the interesting part:
  • UVD 2 dedicated video playback accelerator
    • Support for H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, Multi-View Codec (MVC)6, and Adobe Flash7
The problem is the UVD 2.2 found in the HD 5000 series doesn't have MVC hardware accelerated - required for BluRay 3D if your CPU isn't up to it. So that's UVD 3, as found in the Radeon HD 6800 codenamed Barts, right? Well, no - the UVD 3 has some extra special sauce for DiVX and MPEG hardware acelleration. So lets call this UVD 2.3

Next up is the DisplayPort support - this part features DP 1.2 and native Eyefinity 6 display support, with the requisite connectors. That's improved over HD 5000 series, and just like the HD 6800 cards.

HDMI 1.4a is driver level, so it, and 3D Stereoscopic support, is the same across the HD 5000 and HD 6000 series.

There are another couple of interesting tid-bits in the specifications to ponder:
  • AMD CrossFireX™ multi-GPU technology
    • Dual GPU scaling
  • Ultra-low power state support for multi-GPU configurations

New AMD Catalyst Application Profile 10.11

Catalyst Application Profile 10.11 v3 has been released, with the following updates:

December 8 2010 – Catalyst 10.11 CAP 4
  • 3DMark 2011 – Improves CrossFire performance
  • Dead Space 2 – Forced on Anti-Aliasing through the Catalyst Control Center has been disabled


Download Now here!

25 Kasım 2010 Perşembe

HD 6000 series with Evergreen GPU's listed on AMD site

AMD's ATI Catalyst™ PC VENDOR ID (1002) LIST shows developers the currently supported ASIC's used in their publicly released drivers. An interesting set of new entries has appeared, denoting a set of entry, mainstream and performance level numbered ASIC's using the Evergreen architecture but receiving the Radeon HD 6000 branding:


This page is provided as an engineering resource. The list is of current shipping hardware supported by the current Catalyst Driver.


The snip above clearly shows the new Northern Island (NI) Bart's GPU's alongside Evergreen series ASIC's, branded as HD 6000 series products.

Do these new products indicate the branding of FUSION APU's Graphics capabilities? Is AMD making NVIDIA's Geforce 8000/9000/200/300 'mistake'?

AMD Radeon 6900 'Cayman' Slide Appear

Computerbase.de forum member 'Egghead' (registration required to view post on Computerbase.de) has posted pictures that appear to be taken during AMD's Tech preview day held in San Francisco, in October. Originally posted on Polish site, FrazPC, The slides indicate an NDA lift date of today - November 22nd. Does this add validity to the rumor of the Northern Island 'Cayman' GPU series being delayed to December?



Technical details are included but not comprehensive. Final details of clock speeds, SIMD count, memory bandwidth etc. are all unspecified, adding fuel to the rumor mill fire. Details of note are a new 'EQAA' mode which appears similar to NVIDIA's CSAA mode, multiple concurrent 'virtual kernel' execution (sounds like a must-have for FUSION platforms), a new VLIW-4 architecture design, and dual graphics engines for doubled geometry throughput - and new generation tessellation engine (improved again over Bart's 7th generation unit).


You can see all the pictures here, in our AMD Radeon HD 6000 Rumor discussion thread. Low bandwidth users please be.... patient.

AMD Catalyst 10.11 Windows 7 Driver Analysis

Introduction
 These drivers have arrived a lot earlier than I expected, but I suppose we’re going to have the 10.12 earlier in the month than normal due to the holidays. The December drivers are always interesting as AMD (or previously, ATI) would sometimes throw us a little bonus, with my personal favorite being when we saw the Quad Core support offered which yielded some great performance increases.
 November on the other hand tends to be a little more boring. This November continues to be as busy as the last one due to the HD 6000 series being released, albeit not as soon as some would have hoped. Fingers crossed we don’t slip back further than the current December 13th date.
 Anyway, let’s check out the two performance improvements AMD is offering and then get stuck into our tests.
 
Performance Improvements

 Battleforge: Performance increases up to 3% on ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series single and CrossFire configurations with anti-aliasing disabled.
 STALKER – Call of Pripyat benchmark: Performance increases up to 5% on ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series single and CrossFire configurations.

Continue

24 Kasım 2010 Çarşamba

AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table

With more and more graphics chips being released every day it became very complicated for the user who does not follow the video card market to know the differences among all ATI graphic chips in the market today. To facilitate knowing and understanding the difference among major ATI chips, we have compiled the following table.
It is important to note that starting 2007 both ATI and NVIDIA started referring to the memory clock of their video cards with the real clock rate used. In the past manufacturers referred the memory clocks with double their real clock rate, because DDR and subsequent technologies (DDR2, GDDR3, etc) allow the memory chip to transfer two data per clock cycle. So a video card with a memory chip running at 500 MHz would be referred as having a 1 GHz memory. In order to keep the compatibility of our table, we are still referring the memory clocks with the DDR naming convention – i.e., double the real clock rate – on cards with memories based on DDR or subsequent technologies.
Chip
Core Clock
Memory Clock
Memory Interface
Memory Transfer Rate
Pixels per clock
DirectX
Radeon 9200
250 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9200 Pro
275 MHz
550 MHz
128-bit
8.8 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9200 SE
200 MHz
333 MHz
64-bit
2.6 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9250
240 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9250 SE
240 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9500
275 MHz
540 MHz
128-bit
8.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9550
250 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9550 SE
250 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9500 Pro
275 MHz
540 MHz
128-bit
8.6 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9600
325 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 Pro
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 SE
325 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 XT
500 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9700
275 MHz
540 MHz
256-bit
17.2 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9700 Pro
325 MHz
620 MHz
256-bit
19.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800
325 MHz
580 MHz
256-bit
18.56 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800 Pro
380 MHz
680 MHz
256-bit
21.7 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800 SE
325 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 256-bit
8 GB/s or 16 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9800 XT
412 MHz
730 MHz
256-bit
23.3 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X300 SE
325 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X300
325 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X550
400 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit
8 GB/s or 4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X600 Pro
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X600 XT
500 MHz
730 MHz
128-bit
11.68 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X700
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X700 Pro
420 MHz
864 MHz
128-bit
13.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X700 XT
475 MHz
1.05 GHz
128-bit
16.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X800 SE
*
*
*
*
8
9.0
Radeon X800
400 MHz
700 MHz
256-bit
22.4 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 XL
400 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X800 GT
475 MHz
**
128-bit or 256-bit
**
8
9.0
Radeon X800 GTO
400 MHz
1 GHz ***
256-bit
32 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 Pro
475 MHz
950 MHz
256-bit
30.4 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 XT
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X800 XT PE
520 MHz
1.12 GHz
256-bit
35.8 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X850 Pro
520 MHz
1.08 GHz
256-bit
34.56 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X850 XT
520 MHz
1.08 GHz
256-bit
34.56 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X850 PE
540 MHz
1.18 GHz
256-bit
37.76 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X1050
****
****
****
****
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 HM
450 MHz
1 GHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
16 GB/s or 8 GB/s or 4 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300
450 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
8 GB/s or 4 GB/s or 2 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 Pro
600 MHz
800 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
12.8 GB/s or 6.4 GB/s or 3.2 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 XT
500 MHz
800 MHz (DDR2) or 1 GHz (GDDR3)
128-bit
12.8 GB/s or 16 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1550
450 MHz or 550 MHz or 600 MHz
 800 MHz
64-bit or 128-bit
6.4 GB/s or 12.8 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1600 Pro
500 MHz or 575 MHz
780 MHz
128-bit
12.48 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1600 XT
590 MHz
1.38 GHz
128-bit
22.08 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1650 Pro
600 MHz
1.40 GHz
128-bit
22.40 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1650 XT
575 MHz
1.35 GHz
128-bit
21.60 GB/s
24
9.0c
Radeon X1800 GTO
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1800 XL
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0c
Radeon X1800 XT
625 MHz
1.5 GHz
256-bit
48 GB/s
16
9.0c
Radeon X1900 GT
575 MHz
1.2 GHz
256-bit
38.4 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1900 XT
625 MHz
1.45 GHz
256-bit
46.4 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1900 XTX
650 MHz
1.55 GHz
256-bit
49.6 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1950 GT
500 MHz
1.2 GHz
256-bit
38.4 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1950 Pro
575 MHz
1.38 GHz
256-bit
44.16 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1950 XT
625 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1950 XTX
650 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon HD 2400 Pro
525 MHz
800 MHz
64-bit
6.4 GB/s
40 *****
10
Radeon HD 2400 XT
700 MHz
1.6 GHz
64-bit
12.8 GB/s
40 *****
10
Radeon HD 2600 Pro
600 MHz
800 MHz
128-bit
12.8 GB/s
120 *****
10
Radeon HD 2600 XT
800 MHz
1.6 GHz (GDDR3) or 2.2 GHz (GDDR4)
128-bit
25.6 GB/s (GDDR3) or 35.2 GB/s (GDDR4)
120 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 GT
600 MHz
1.6 GHz
256-bit
51.2 GB/s
240 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 Pro
600 MHz
1.85 GHz
512-bit
118.4 GB/s
320 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 XT
740 MHz
1.65 GHz (GDDR3) or 2 GHz (GDDR4)
512-bit
105.6 GB/s (GDDR3) or 128 GB/s (GDDR4)
320 *****
10
Radeon HD 3450 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz
64-bit
8 GB/s
40 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3470 ^
800 MHz
1.90 GHz
64-bit
15.2 GB/s
40 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3650 ^
725 MHz
1 GHZ (DDR2) or 1.6 GHz (GDDR3)
128-bit
16 GB/s (DDR2) or 25.6 GB/s (GDDR3)
120 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3690 ^
668 MHz
1,656 MHz
128-bit
26.5 GB/s
 120 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3850 ^
670 MHz 
1.66 GHz
256-bit
53.12 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3870 ^
775 MHz
2.25 GHz
256-bit
72 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3870 X2 ^  +
825 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4350 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz
64-bit
8 GB/s
80 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4550 ^
800 MHz
1.6 GHz
64-bit
12.8 GB/s
80 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4650 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz or 1.4 GHz
128-bit
16 GB/s or 22.4 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4670 ^
750 MHz
2 GHz (512 MB) or 1,746 MHz (1 GB)
128-bit
32 GB/s or 27.94 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4730 ^
750 MHz
1.8 GHz
128-bit
28.8 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4770 ^
750 MHz
3.2 GHz
128-bit
51.2 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4830 ^
575 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4850 ^
625 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4850 X2 ^ +
625 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4870 ^
750 MHz
3.6 GHz
256-bit
115.2 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4870 X2 ^ +
750 MHz
3.6 GHz
256-bit
115.2 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4890 ^
850 MHz
3.9 GHz
256-bit
124.8 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 5450 ^
650 MHz
800 MHz (DDR2) or 1.6 GHz (DDR3)
64-bit
6.4 GB/s (DDR2) or 12.8 GB/s (DDR3)
80 *****
11
Radeon HD 5550 ^
550 MHz
 (varies)
128-bit
 (varies)
320 *****
11
Radeon HD 5570 ^
650 MHz
1.8 GHz
128-bit
28.8 GB/s
400 *****
11
Radeon HD 5670 ^
775 MHz
4 GHz
128-bit
64 GB/s
400 *****
11
Radeon HD 5750 ^
705 MHz
4.6 GHz
128-bit
73.6 GB/s
720 *****
11
Radeon HD 5770 ^
850 MHz
4.8 GHz
128-bit
76.8 GB/s
800 *****
11
Radeon HD 5830 ^
800 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
1,120 *****
11
Radeon HD 5850 ^
725 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
1,440 *****
11
Radeon HD 5870 ^
850 MHz
4.8 GHz
256-bit
153.6 GB/s
1,600 *****
11
Radeon HD 5970 ^ +
725 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s 
1,600 *****
11
Radeon HD 6390 ^
550 MHz
(varies)
128-bit
(varies)
320 *****
11
Radeon HD 6850 ^
775 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
960 *****
11
Radeon HD 6870 ^
900 MHz
4.2 GHz
256-bit
134.4 GB/s
1,120 *****
11
* ATI doesn't set a default clock for Radeon X800 SE chip. The specs depend on the video card manufacturer. So you have to take care when comparing video cards using this chip.
** Depends on the model. There are boards based on Radeon X800 GT using DDR, DDR2 and GDDR3 memories running at different speeds. We've seen GDDR3 models running at 980 MHz and DDR models running at 700 MHz. You can calculate the memory transfer rate using the formula memory clock x number of bits / 8. A model with GDDR3 memory running at 980 MHz and 256-bit interface has a transfer rate of 31.36 GB/s.
*** There are models using DDR memories and running at lower clock rates.
**** There are three video card versions using this chip with very different specs, depending on the memory chips used. If they are 128 MB DDR, then the graphics chip runs at 400 MHz, the memory runs at 500 MHz, a 128-bit memory interface is used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 8 GB/s. If the card has 128 MB DDR2, then the graphics chip runs at 325 MHz, the memory runs at 666 MHz, a 64-bit memory interface is used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 5.3 GB/s. And finally if the card has 256 MB DDR2 then the graphics chip runs at 400 MHz, the memory runs at 666 MHz, a 128-bit memory interface us used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 10.6 GB/s.
***** The shader unit is unified, meaning that this chip doesn't have separated pixel shader and vertex shader units. Read our article AMD ATI Radeon HD 2000 Series Architecture for more information. On video cards from Radeon HD 2400 and HD 2600 series the video card manufacturer can use a different clock for the memory (usually lower, thus achieveing a lower performance compared to the reference model); the clock rates published here are the official one.
^ Based on PCI Express 2.0, which doubles the available I/O bandwidth from 2.5 GB/s to 5 GB/s if a PCI Express 2.0 motherboard is used.
+ Radeon HD 3870 X2, Radeon HD 4850 X2, HD 4870 X2 and HD 5970 use two Radeon chips working in parallel (CrossFire). The specs published are for only one of the chips.
When you compare chips, you have to be very careful. Judging from the table, a Radeon 9800 may seem slower than a Radeon 9600 Pro, since its clock is inferior, and a Radeon X700 Pro seems faster than a Radeon X800 since it uses a higher clock rate.
However, Radeon 9800 accesses its memory using a 256-bit interface and processes eight pixels per clock pulse, while the Radeon 9600 Pro accesses its memory using a 128-bit interface and processes four pixels per clock pulse. This means that memory access and processing performance of the Radeon 9800 would the double of that of the Radeon 9600 Pro if they were working at the same clock. In other words, a Radeon 9600 Pro would have work at 650 MHz and access the memory at 1.360 MHz to have the same performance of the Radeon 9800.
The same idea goes for the Radeon X700 Pro example, it accesses memory using a 128-bit interface and processes data at 8 pixels per clock tick, while Radeon X800 accesses memory using a 256-bit interface and processes data at 12 pixels per clock tick.
Therefore, it is not correct to compare graphic chips only through their clocks. For the processing performance you will have to compare the clocks and the number of pixels per clock. As of the memory, the right way to compare its performance among different chips is through their memory transfer rate, which is calculated using the formula (clock x bits per clock)/ 8.
As you can see in the table, "SE" chips are the simplest and access the memory at only 64 bits per time. Another detail is that ATI uses the letters "XT" to indicate the fastest chip in a series, while its competitor, NVIDIA, uses the same letters to indicate the simplest chip in a series.
"PE" stands for "Platinum Edition" and are models even faster than the "XT" models, aimed to gamers with money.
As for the DirectX version, check the table below:
DirectX
Shader Model
7.0
No
8.1
1.4
9.0
2.0
9.0c
3.0
10
4.0
10.1
4.1
11
5.0