30 Kasım 2010 Salı

Roundup: Four Radeon HD 6850 1 GB Cards Compared

Improvements to performance, acoustics, and bundles can add big value once a reference graphics card is modified by third-party vendors. We compare four modified Radeon HD 6850 1 GB boards to find out which company's additions best suit your gaming needs.
Some say green is the new red, and no place is that more true than in the rebranding of ATI to AMD. And yet, marketing similarities between AMD and Nvidia don’t end in color, as the newer, more efficient Radeon HD 6850 offers performance and a price nearly identical to Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460 1 GB. If you want to know more about the card itself, check out our launch review of the Radeon HD 6870 and 6850.
AMD’s slightly better power consumption figures mean that buyers of the new green team can go green for the same green, while saving a little green over the life of the card (Ed.: Xzibit approves, dawg).
If you believe this makes the Radeon HD 6850 a perfect mid-priced performance part, you're in good company, as the number of folks willing to spend ~$200 is much greater than the market for flagship $500 boards.
If you're ready to buy, there are plenty of options available. Some vendors even offer multiple models. Choosing a card certainly doesn’t have to be difficult. We simply asked every major manufacturer to send its best, and those who didn’t have anything to offer beyond AMD's reference design chose not to participate. That left us with four souped-up models for your consideration.
Radeon HD 6850 1 GB Comparison Specifications
Asus EAH6850
DC/2DIS/1GD5
MSI R6850
PM2D1GD5
PowerColor AX6850
1GBD5-PPDHG
Sapphire Toxic 6850
100315TXSR
GPU Clock790 MHz775 MHz820 MHz820 MHz
DRAM RateGDDR5-4000GDDR5-4000GDDR5-4400GDDR5-4400
DVITwo Dual-LinkTwo Dual-LinkTwo Dual-LinkTwo Dual-Link
HDMIFull-SizeFull-SizeFull-SizeFull-Size
DisplayPortFull-SizeFull-SizeFull-SizeDual Mini
VGABy Adapter (x1)By Adapter (x1)By Adapter (x1)By Adapter (x1)
Output
Adapters
DVI to VGADVI to VGADVI to VGADVI to VGA
Mini to Full DP
Length9.7"9.0"8.9"9.6"
Height4.8"4.4"4.4"4.4"
Total
Thickness
1.6"1.5"1.6"1.6"
Cooler
Thickness
1.4"1.4"1.4"1.4"
Weight18 Ounces16 Ounces19 Ounces27 Ounces
PCB VersionC223 Rev. 1.00V224 V1.0LF R97FF V1.0109-C22237-00
VRMThree PhasesThree PhasesFour PhasesFour Phases
WarrantyThree YearsThree YearsTwo YearsTwo Years
Added ValuePCIe Power Adapter
CrossFire Bridge
CD Wallet
PCIe Power Adapter
CrossFire Bridge
CrossFire Bridge
Free "Call of Duty:
Modern Warfare 2"
6' HDMI Cable
2 x PCIe Power Adapter
CrossFire Bridge
Price$200 $205 $210 $210 


http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-6850-eah6850-ax6850,2794.htm

Wallace and Gromit at Harvey Nichols in Bristol

British fashion chain, Harvey Nichols called on well known claymation heroes Wallace and Gromit, along with their companion Lady Torrington, to announce the opening of the Bristol Store in 2008. Wallace the man, Gromit the beagle, and Lady Tottington the woman, are creations of Nick Park at Aardman Animations who are based in Bristol. The campaign, Wallace in Alexander McQueen & Gromit in Paul Smith, Wallace in Paul Smith & Gromit in Duchamp, Lady Tottington in Alexander McQueen, won the platinum honour award at the Creative Circle awards in March 2009, along with a suite of gold awards.
Lody Tottington in Harvey Nichols print advertisement
Lady Torrington seen wearing a black draped jersey ‘Acorn’ dress by Alexander McQueen, red patent ‘Triclo’ shoes by Christian Louboutin and metallic bronze ’Puffy’ bag by Zagliani.
Wallace and Gromit in Harvey Nichols print advertisement
Wallace wears navy cashmere jacket and silk tapered trousers by Alexander McQueen, Dolce & Gabbana fitted white shirt and Giorgio Armani tie. Gromit wears navy silk Paul Smith scarf.

Credits

The Wallace and Gromit campaign was developed at DDB London by creative director Jeremy Craigen, creative Grant Parker, typographrer Pete Mould and photographer Giles Revell, using characters designed at Aardman Animations.
Julia Bowe, marketing director for Harvey Nichols, Grant Parker at DDB London, Nick Park at Aardman, Graham Maiden, model maker, talk through the background to the campaign. Click on the image below to play the video in YouTube (HD)
The campaign won the Platinum Award, and Gold honours for Best Newspaper Campaign, Best Poster Campaign, Best Newspaper Advertisement, Best Poster, Best Portrait Poster, Best Landscape Poster.
Wallace and Gromit in Harvey Nichols print advertisement

25 Kasım 2010 Perşembe

HD 6000 series with Evergreen GPU's listed on AMD site

AMD's ATI Catalyst™ PC VENDOR ID (1002) LIST shows developers the currently supported ASIC's used in their publicly released drivers. An interesting set of new entries has appeared, denoting a set of entry, mainstream and performance level numbered ASIC's using the Evergreen architecture but receiving the Radeon HD 6000 branding:


This page is provided as an engineering resource. The list is of current shipping hardware supported by the current Catalyst Driver.


The snip above clearly shows the new Northern Island (NI) Bart's GPU's alongside Evergreen series ASIC's, branded as HD 6000 series products.

Do these new products indicate the branding of FUSION APU's Graphics capabilities? Is AMD making NVIDIA's Geforce 8000/9000/200/300 'mistake'?

AMD Radeon 6900 'Cayman' Slide Appear

Computerbase.de forum member 'Egghead' (registration required to view post on Computerbase.de) has posted pictures that appear to be taken during AMD's Tech preview day held in San Francisco, in October. Originally posted on Polish site, FrazPC, The slides indicate an NDA lift date of today - November 22nd. Does this add validity to the rumor of the Northern Island 'Cayman' GPU series being delayed to December?



Technical details are included but not comprehensive. Final details of clock speeds, SIMD count, memory bandwidth etc. are all unspecified, adding fuel to the rumor mill fire. Details of note are a new 'EQAA' mode which appears similar to NVIDIA's CSAA mode, multiple concurrent 'virtual kernel' execution (sounds like a must-have for FUSION platforms), a new VLIW-4 architecture design, and dual graphics engines for doubled geometry throughput - and new generation tessellation engine (improved again over Bart's 7th generation unit).


You can see all the pictures here, in our AMD Radeon HD 6000 Rumor discussion thread. Low bandwidth users please be.... patient.

AMD Catalyst 10.11 Windows 7 Driver Analysis

Introduction
 These drivers have arrived a lot earlier than I expected, but I suppose we’re going to have the 10.12 earlier in the month than normal due to the holidays. The December drivers are always interesting as AMD (or previously, ATI) would sometimes throw us a little bonus, with my personal favorite being when we saw the Quad Core support offered which yielded some great performance increases.
 November on the other hand tends to be a little more boring. This November continues to be as busy as the last one due to the HD 6000 series being released, albeit not as soon as some would have hoped. Fingers crossed we don’t slip back further than the current December 13th date.
 Anyway, let’s check out the two performance improvements AMD is offering and then get stuck into our tests.
 
Performance Improvements

 Battleforge: Performance increases up to 3% on ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series single and CrossFire configurations with anti-aliasing disabled.
 STALKER – Call of Pripyat benchmark: Performance increases up to 5% on ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series single and CrossFire configurations.

Continue

24 Kasım 2010 Çarşamba

IE9 Pre-RC (Beta 2) Version 9.0.8027.6000 Leaked Download

If you have the opinion that the official IE9 Beta still has lots of bugs and incompatibility, a newer and supposedly better version of pre-release IE9 build has been leaked to Internet. IE9 Pre-RC, or rather the IE9 Beta 2 been the second build which been released or leaked to public, has the build version of 9.0.8027.6000. The build has a even newer version number than the Internet Explorer 9 Platform Preview 7 build 9.0.8023.6000 which was released recently.

The IE9 Pre-RC Beta includes new features such as a download speed indicator for the download manager, and fixes some important reliability and compatibility issues, in addition to enhance web page loading speed and general performance. Overall, IE9 Pre-RC is said to improve user experience over IE9 Beta.

The leaked IE9 Beta v9.0.8027.6000 was the build that been distributed to VIP testers by Microsoft, but not available officially for the general public, except through the leak download. After installed the leaked IE9 Pre-RC, it’s listed as “Windows Internet Explorer 9 Release Candidate” in the Installed Updates of Control Panel.
People who interested to experience the new IE9 build can download the setup installer here:
32-bit (x86): IE9-Windows7-x86-enu.exe
64-bit (x64): IE9-Windows7-x64-enu.exe

AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table

With more and more graphics chips being released every day it became very complicated for the user who does not follow the video card market to know the differences among all ATI graphic chips in the market today. To facilitate knowing and understanding the difference among major ATI chips, we have compiled the following table.
It is important to note that starting 2007 both ATI and NVIDIA started referring to the memory clock of their video cards with the real clock rate used. In the past manufacturers referred the memory clocks with double their real clock rate, because DDR and subsequent technologies (DDR2, GDDR3, etc) allow the memory chip to transfer two data per clock cycle. So a video card with a memory chip running at 500 MHz would be referred as having a 1 GHz memory. In order to keep the compatibility of our table, we are still referring the memory clocks with the DDR naming convention – i.e., double the real clock rate – on cards with memories based on DDR or subsequent technologies.
Chip
Core Clock
Memory Clock
Memory Interface
Memory Transfer Rate
Pixels per clock
DirectX
Radeon 9200
250 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9200 Pro
275 MHz
550 MHz
128-bit
8.8 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9200 SE
200 MHz
333 MHz
64-bit
2.6 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9250
240 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9250 SE
240 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
8.1
Radeon 9500
275 MHz
540 MHz
128-bit
8.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9550
250 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9550 SE
250 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9500 Pro
275 MHz
540 MHz
128-bit
8.6 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9600
325 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 Pro
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 SE
325 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9600 XT
500 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9700
275 MHz
540 MHz
256-bit
17.2 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9700 Pro
325 MHz
620 MHz
256-bit
19.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800
325 MHz
580 MHz
256-bit
18.56 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800 Pro
380 MHz
680 MHz
256-bit
21.7 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon 9800 SE
325 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 256-bit
8 GB/s or 16 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon 9800 XT
412 MHz
730 MHz
256-bit
23.3 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X300 SE
325 MHz
400 MHz
64-bit
3.2 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X300
325 MHz
400 MHz
128-bit
6.4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X550
400 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit
8 GB/s or 4 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X600 Pro
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X600 XT
500 MHz
730 MHz
128-bit
11.68 GB/s
4
9.0
Radeon X700
400 MHz
600 MHz
128-bit
9.6 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X700 Pro
420 MHz
864 MHz
128-bit
13.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X700 XT
475 MHz
1.05 GHz
128-bit
16.8 GB/s
8
9.0
Radeon X800 SE
*
*
*
*
8
9.0
Radeon X800
400 MHz
700 MHz
256-bit
22.4 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 XL
400 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X800 GT
475 MHz
**
128-bit or 256-bit
**
8
9.0
Radeon X800 GTO
400 MHz
1 GHz ***
256-bit
32 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 Pro
475 MHz
950 MHz
256-bit
30.4 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X800 XT
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X800 XT PE
520 MHz
1.12 GHz
256-bit
35.8 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X850 Pro
520 MHz
1.08 GHz
256-bit
34.56 GB/s
12
9.0
Radeon X850 XT
520 MHz
1.08 GHz
256-bit
34.56 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X850 PE
540 MHz
1.18 GHz
256-bit
37.76 GB/s
16
9.0
Radeon X1050
****
****
****
****
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 HM
450 MHz
1 GHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
16 GB/s or 8 GB/s or 4 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300
450 MHz
500 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
8 GB/s or 4 GB/s or 2 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 Pro
600 MHz
800 MHz
128-bit or 64-bit or 32-bit
12.8 GB/s or 6.4 GB/s or 3.2 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1300 XT
500 MHz
800 MHz (DDR2) or 1 GHz (GDDR3)
128-bit
12.8 GB/s or 16 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1550
450 MHz or 550 MHz or 600 MHz
 800 MHz
64-bit or 128-bit
6.4 GB/s or 12.8 GB/s
4
9.0c
Radeon X1600 Pro
500 MHz or 575 MHz
780 MHz
128-bit
12.48 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1600 XT
590 MHz
1.38 GHz
128-bit
22.08 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1650 Pro
600 MHz
1.40 GHz
128-bit
22.40 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1650 XT
575 MHz
1.35 GHz
128-bit
21.60 GB/s
24
9.0c
Radeon X1800 GTO
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
12
9.0c
Radeon X1800 XL
500 MHz
1 GHz
256-bit
32 GB/s
16
9.0c
Radeon X1800 XT
625 MHz
1.5 GHz
256-bit
48 GB/s
16
9.0c
Radeon X1900 GT
575 MHz
1.2 GHz
256-bit
38.4 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1900 XT
625 MHz
1.45 GHz
256-bit
46.4 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1900 XTX
650 MHz
1.55 GHz
256-bit
49.6 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1950 GT
500 MHz
1.2 GHz
256-bit
38.4 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1950 Pro
575 MHz
1.38 GHz
256-bit
44.16 GB/s
36
9.0c
Radeon X1950 XT
625 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon X1950 XTX
650 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
48
9.0c
Radeon HD 2400 Pro
525 MHz
800 MHz
64-bit
6.4 GB/s
40 *****
10
Radeon HD 2400 XT
700 MHz
1.6 GHz
64-bit
12.8 GB/s
40 *****
10
Radeon HD 2600 Pro
600 MHz
800 MHz
128-bit
12.8 GB/s
120 *****
10
Radeon HD 2600 XT
800 MHz
1.6 GHz (GDDR3) or 2.2 GHz (GDDR4)
128-bit
25.6 GB/s (GDDR3) or 35.2 GB/s (GDDR4)
120 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 GT
600 MHz
1.6 GHz
256-bit
51.2 GB/s
240 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 Pro
600 MHz
1.85 GHz
512-bit
118.4 GB/s
320 *****
10
Radeon HD 2900 XT
740 MHz
1.65 GHz (GDDR3) or 2 GHz (GDDR4)
512-bit
105.6 GB/s (GDDR3) or 128 GB/s (GDDR4)
320 *****
10
Radeon HD 3450 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz
64-bit
8 GB/s
40 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3470 ^
800 MHz
1.90 GHz
64-bit
15.2 GB/s
40 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3650 ^
725 MHz
1 GHZ (DDR2) or 1.6 GHz (GDDR3)
128-bit
16 GB/s (DDR2) or 25.6 GB/s (GDDR3)
120 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3690 ^
668 MHz
1,656 MHz
128-bit
26.5 GB/s
 120 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3850 ^
670 MHz 
1.66 GHz
256-bit
53.12 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3870 ^
775 MHz
2.25 GHz
256-bit
72 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 3870 X2 ^  +
825 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4350 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz
64-bit
8 GB/s
80 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4550 ^
800 MHz
1.6 GHz
64-bit
12.8 GB/s
80 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4650 ^
600 MHz
1 GHz or 1.4 GHz
128-bit
16 GB/s or 22.4 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4670 ^
750 MHz
2 GHz (512 MB) or 1,746 MHz (1 GB)
128-bit
32 GB/s or 27.94 GB/s
320 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4730 ^
750 MHz
1.8 GHz
128-bit
28.8 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4770 ^
750 MHz
3.2 GHz
128-bit
51.2 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4830 ^
575 MHz
1.8 GHz
256-bit
57.6 GB/s
640 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4850 ^
625 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4850 X2 ^ +
625 MHz
2 GHz
256-bit
64 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4870 ^
750 MHz
3.6 GHz
256-bit
115.2 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4870 X2 ^ +
750 MHz
3.6 GHz
256-bit
115.2 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 4890 ^
850 MHz
3.9 GHz
256-bit
124.8 GB/s
800 *****
10.1
Radeon HD 5450 ^
650 MHz
800 MHz (DDR2) or 1.6 GHz (DDR3)
64-bit
6.4 GB/s (DDR2) or 12.8 GB/s (DDR3)
80 *****
11
Radeon HD 5550 ^
550 MHz
 (varies)
128-bit
 (varies)
320 *****
11
Radeon HD 5570 ^
650 MHz
1.8 GHz
128-bit
28.8 GB/s
400 *****
11
Radeon HD 5670 ^
775 MHz
4 GHz
128-bit
64 GB/s
400 *****
11
Radeon HD 5750 ^
705 MHz
4.6 GHz
128-bit
73.6 GB/s
720 *****
11
Radeon HD 5770 ^
850 MHz
4.8 GHz
128-bit
76.8 GB/s
800 *****
11
Radeon HD 5830 ^
800 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
1,120 *****
11
Radeon HD 5850 ^
725 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
1,440 *****
11
Radeon HD 5870 ^
850 MHz
4.8 GHz
256-bit
153.6 GB/s
1,600 *****
11
Radeon HD 5970 ^ +
725 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s 
1,600 *****
11
Radeon HD 6390 ^
550 MHz
(varies)
128-bit
(varies)
320 *****
11
Radeon HD 6850 ^
775 MHz
4 GHz
256-bit
128 GB/s
960 *****
11
Radeon HD 6870 ^
900 MHz
4.2 GHz
256-bit
134.4 GB/s
1,120 *****
11
* ATI doesn't set a default clock for Radeon X800 SE chip. The specs depend on the video card manufacturer. So you have to take care when comparing video cards using this chip.
** Depends on the model. There are boards based on Radeon X800 GT using DDR, DDR2 and GDDR3 memories running at different speeds. We've seen GDDR3 models running at 980 MHz and DDR models running at 700 MHz. You can calculate the memory transfer rate using the formula memory clock x number of bits / 8. A model with GDDR3 memory running at 980 MHz and 256-bit interface has a transfer rate of 31.36 GB/s.
*** There are models using DDR memories and running at lower clock rates.
**** There are three video card versions using this chip with very different specs, depending on the memory chips used. If they are 128 MB DDR, then the graphics chip runs at 400 MHz, the memory runs at 500 MHz, a 128-bit memory interface is used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 8 GB/s. If the card has 128 MB DDR2, then the graphics chip runs at 325 MHz, the memory runs at 666 MHz, a 64-bit memory interface is used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 5.3 GB/s. And finally if the card has 256 MB DDR2 then the graphics chip runs at 400 MHz, the memory runs at 666 MHz, a 128-bit memory interface us used and the memory has a maximum theoretical transfer rate of 10.6 GB/s.
***** The shader unit is unified, meaning that this chip doesn't have separated pixel shader and vertex shader units. Read our article AMD ATI Radeon HD 2000 Series Architecture for more information. On video cards from Radeon HD 2400 and HD 2600 series the video card manufacturer can use a different clock for the memory (usually lower, thus achieveing a lower performance compared to the reference model); the clock rates published here are the official one.
^ Based on PCI Express 2.0, which doubles the available I/O bandwidth from 2.5 GB/s to 5 GB/s if a PCI Express 2.0 motherboard is used.
+ Radeon HD 3870 X2, Radeon HD 4850 X2, HD 4870 X2 and HD 5970 use two Radeon chips working in parallel (CrossFire). The specs published are for only one of the chips.
When you compare chips, you have to be very careful. Judging from the table, a Radeon 9800 may seem slower than a Radeon 9600 Pro, since its clock is inferior, and a Radeon X700 Pro seems faster than a Radeon X800 since it uses a higher clock rate.
However, Radeon 9800 accesses its memory using a 256-bit interface and processes eight pixels per clock pulse, while the Radeon 9600 Pro accesses its memory using a 128-bit interface and processes four pixels per clock pulse. This means that memory access and processing performance of the Radeon 9800 would the double of that of the Radeon 9600 Pro if they were working at the same clock. In other words, a Radeon 9600 Pro would have work at 650 MHz and access the memory at 1.360 MHz to have the same performance of the Radeon 9800.
The same idea goes for the Radeon X700 Pro example, it accesses memory using a 128-bit interface and processes data at 8 pixels per clock tick, while Radeon X800 accesses memory using a 256-bit interface and processes data at 12 pixels per clock tick.
Therefore, it is not correct to compare graphic chips only through their clocks. For the processing performance you will have to compare the clocks and the number of pixels per clock. As of the memory, the right way to compare its performance among different chips is through their memory transfer rate, which is calculated using the formula (clock x bits per clock)/ 8.
As you can see in the table, "SE" chips are the simplest and access the memory at only 64 bits per time. Another detail is that ATI uses the letters "XT" to indicate the fastest chip in a series, while its competitor, NVIDIA, uses the same letters to indicate the simplest chip in a series.
"PE" stands for "Platinum Edition" and are models even faster than the "XT" models, aimed to gamers with money.
As for the DirectX version, check the table below:
DirectX
Shader Model
7.0
No
8.1
1.4
9.0
2.0
9.0c
3.0
10
4.0
10.1
4.1
11
5.0